Yesterday I popped into the
Beatson for a wee bleed and to pick up this month’s bumper bag of harsh
chemicals. My last. That’ll be six monthly poisonings under my belt come
Sunday, with no more due.
I should have got this round
of chemo last week, but my white cells were low and my consultant regarded it
as “a bit gung-ho” to dole out drugs which batter the immune system while it
was already punch-drunk. So the regular envenoming was deferred for a week, my
counts returned to normal, and this morning I took the first of my final five
doses.
Feeling fine so far.
I’d like to think it’s my
last round. It’s the last I’m scheduled for, and the last I’ll get as long as
things remain as they are. If one of my three-monthly scans shows anything
tumourly trying to sneak back, I’ll be back on the Temozolomide sharpish, but
I’m not planning on that happening. I’ve told it not to.
I had hoped that the end of
the chemo would mean an end to the off-and-on tiredness which has plagued me
throughout this whole process. I’d reckoned that since it takes a month for me
to recover sufficiently between treatments, then a month should be enough to
get back to normal.
Nah.
I’m now told that the
fatigue can last up to six months after the chemo stops; it depends on the individual,
and there doesn’t seem to be any way of telling how it will hit, other than
that younger, fitter patients recover more quickly. That includes me (no,
really) so with a bit of luck it will ease off sooner than later. Ideally
before I go on holiday.
The other thing I wish would
just bugger off and leave me alone is the constant stiffness in my legs and
occasionally arms. It’s a bit like the sensation you get the day after a long
hill-walk, but all the time (I can’t really compare it to many other kinds of
exercise, having spent most of my life avoiding them, but I have been known to
enjoy the occasional countryside meander). If I sit still for too long I need to
haul myself up with my arms and then waddle rather than spring gazelle-like
across the room, as was once my wont. This, I gather, is a side-effect of
coming off steroids; they cause some muscle reduction, but also a loosening of
ligaments in the back and legs. I’m told pregnant women experience something
similar: I’m hoping this is the only symptom we’re going to share; I could do
without morning sickness, haemorrhoids or childbirth.
But the really grim symptom
of all this is the news that I may not be able to drive again for a very long
time. I had previously been told that I would be likely to get my licence back
a year after the surgery. That was on December 1, so I was starting to look
forward to my licence's return. Counting down, even.
Now I’m told that it could
be at least two years, and no-one’s very sure from when. It all depends on when
the DVLA (not my doctor, apparently) decides my primary treatment ended, or
indeed what my primary treatment was.
If they decide the primary
treatment was the surgery (which my research suggests they won't) then it’s another
year from December. If they decide it was the radiotherapy and first round of
chemo, it’s a further year from mid-February. But if they decide the adjuvant
chemo I’m just finishing off is part of the primary treatment, then it’s two
years from now. And if I need any further treatment during that period, the
clock resets.
This is quite crushing.
Quality of life is pretty important just now, and not being able to drive is a
massive limitation. Blind 75-year-olds and mental teenagers are allowed
licences; what makes me less safe than them?
Well, the huge hole in my
brain, apparently. But I have only had the one fit, and that nearly a year ago
(it’s how I found out about the cancer in the first place). Since then I’ve had
the tumour which caused it cut out, the area around it zapped and poisoned, and
I’ve taken anti-epileptics daily. I haven’t so much as twitched in all that
time. Surely I’m safe to be behind a wheel?
It seems the DVLA thinks
not. They won't even ask my doctors for their opinion, I'm informed; the decision
will be made by a government medic who will never meet or examine me, based on
some forms which don't contain space for my doctors' input.
I understand the reluctance
of officialdom to have people with large chunks of their brains missing
hurtling around the countryside in cars. But I'm being checked on very, very
regularly. Even now the chemo's over and my monthly trips to the Beatson have come
to an end, I will still have three-monthly scans. Surely these could be used as
the basis for my continued right to drive, with my licence renewed quarterly
every time a scan gets the all-clear? It wouldn't be hard to administer
electronically, and it would save a lot of misery for a lot of people in my
position.
The next scan is in
September. It was scheduled for the 28th, but by the time I got the
date I’d booked a holiday, so it was moved forward to the 19th.
Which is fine, but it means I won’t get the results until I’m back, so I’ll
spend my two weeks in the sun Not Knowing. Looming capitals intended.
Still, it should be fine.
June’s cerebral photo-shoot wasn’t substantially different from March’s, and
I’ll have just finished my treatment, so there’s no reason to think September’s
will show any changes either.
So if it is OK, can I drive
at least until the Christmas scan, please? It would at least give me something immediately
positive out of the cycle of quarterly anxiety I'm going to have to get used
to: the build-up to each scan, the wait
for the results, and the hoped-for relief when they come back clear.
Until they don’t. But that
might (just might) never happen, or at least not for years. Until then, I could
be driving safely and happily.
Just a thought.
As someone who has gone through this process several times in the last eight years, when looking at renewal/reinstatement of a licence they do ask your consultant and GP for their opinion. The worst thing is DVLA inefficiency, the worst example of which was when they took nine months to decide if my husband was fit to drive. Although he had been given his licence back, his consultant was concerned about a vision defect and told him not to drive in the meantime. If he had driven, it might have invalidated his insurance.
ReplyDeleteOn that matter, because he didn't have his licence for more than 2 years, he couldn't hold an car insurance policy so the company took away his no claims bonus completely. It's a complete minefield -almost more traumatic than the treatment!